- Peringkat
- #158
- Total token output
- 110,125
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 56.77s
- Total Biaya
- $1.798
Ember-1 (high) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Ember-1 (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.1 vs 7.0. GLM 5.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.053 vs $1.798. Ember-1 (high) lebih cepat di 56.77s vs 58.80s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.2% vs 65.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #164
- Total token output
- 215,889
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.80s
- Total Biaya
- $1.053
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.1 (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Ember-1 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Peringkat | #158 | #164 |
| Keandalan | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| Konsistensi | 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.2% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 7 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 14.981 | 6.923 |
| Total Biaya | $1.798 | $1.053 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Total token input | 48,577 | 82,592 |
| Token output | 7,345 | 16,089 |
| Token penalaran | 102,780 | 199,800 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 56.77s | 58.80s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 255.06s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1248.88s | 1234.72s |
| Parameter | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#158 Ember-1
high- Biaya
- $0.038
- Waktu
- 55.1s
- Token
- 2,671 tok
#164 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumSpace Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumEmber-1highvsGrok 4.3mediumEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneEmber-1highvsGPT-6 LunalowGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsEmber-1highGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumEmber-1highvsGPT-5.5noneEmber-1highvsMercury 2mediumEmber-1highvsGrok 4.20mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1medium