#87 Qwen3.5-Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 25.8s
- Token
- 4,294 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Step 3.7 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.1 vs 6.8. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.080 vs $1.148. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) lebih cepat di 63.29s vs 64.46s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.4% vs 63.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-Flash (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 7.1), while costing about 14.4x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.8 | 7.1 |
| Peringkat | #87 | #79 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.4% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.871 | 10.434 |
| Total Biaya | $0.080 | $1.148 |
| Harga input | $0.065 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.260 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 38,926 | 38,391 |
| Token output | 2,088 | 991,355 |
| Token penalaran | 294,598 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 63.29s | 64.46s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 234.29s | 364.99s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1265.85s | 1353.57s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#79 Step 3.7 Flash
high- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 63.6s
- Token
- 6,030 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 58.87s | 6,685 | 302 | 90,081 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 4.0 | 6.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 206.21s | 6,057 | 327,340 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Step 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.1mediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumLaguna XS 2.1mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashhighStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsStep 3.7 FlashhighKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashhighDeepSeek V4 PrononevsStep 3.7 FlashhighGemini 3.5 FlashnonevsStep 3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8nonevsStep 3.7 Flashhigh