#73 Claude Opus 4.8
none- Biaya
- $0.053
- Waktu
- 22.0s
- Token
- 2,253 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Claude Opus 4.8 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.2 vs 7.1. Claude Opus 4.8 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.539 vs $1.148. Claude Opus 4.8 lebih cepat di 3.48s vs 64.46s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 61.9% vs 63.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Opus 4.8It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 2.1x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Peringkat | #73 | #79 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 61.9% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 4.485 | 10.434 |
| Total Biaya | $0.539 | $1.148 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 67,104 | 38,391 |
| Token output | 8,107 | 991,355 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 3.48s | 64.46s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 17.73s | 364.99s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 73.00s | 1353.57s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#79 Step 3.7 Flash
high- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 63.6s
- Token
- 6,030 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.29s | 10,590 | 1,332 | 0 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 4.0 | 6.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 206.21s | 6,057 | 327,340 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Step 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.1mediumLaguna XS 2.1mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashhighStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneClaude Opus 4.8nonevsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisQwen3.7 PlusnonevsStep 3.7 FlashhighKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashhighDeepSeek V4 PrononevsStep 3.7 FlashhighGemini 3.5 FlashnonevsStep 3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8nonevsGrok 4.20mediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsGLM 5.1mediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsGemini 3 Flash Previewlow