- Peringkat
- #16
- Total token output
- 13,138
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 7.15s
- Total Biaya
- $0.460
GPT-6.1 Sol (low) vs GLM 5.2 (high)
GPT-6.1 Sol (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.6 vs 8.4. GPT-6.1 Sol (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.460 vs $4.632. GPT-6.1 Sol (low) lebih cepat di 7.15s vs 69.11s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 92.8% vs 71.0%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #78
- Total token output
- 382,333
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 69.11s
- Total Biaya
- $4.632
Model yang direkomendasikan
GPT-6.1 Sol (low)
It has the best score here (9.6), while costing about 10.1x less than GLM 5.2 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | GPT-6.1 Sol GPT-6.1 Sol low | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Peringkat | #16 | #78 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 92.8% | 71.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 2.187 | 7.314 |
| Total Biaya | $0.460 | $4.632 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $0.153 / 1M |
| Harga output | $10.000 / 1M | $12.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.100 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | $2.500 / 1M | T/A |
| Total token input | 163,900 | 288,913 |
| Token output | 4,958 | 79,462 |
| Token penalaran | 8,180 | 303,120 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 7.15s | 69.11s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 46.57s | 599.43s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 164.47s | 1589.43s |
| Parameter | ~2T total (~150B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#16 GPT-6.1 Sol
low- Biaya
- $0.028
- Waktu
- 44.6s
- Token
- 2,881 tok
#78 GLM 5.2
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 46.57s | 85,882 | 798 | 461 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 52.45s | 205,091 | 7,422 | 10,505 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.14s | 606 | 147 | 226 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.80s | 639 | 406 | 2,660 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.48s | 7,302 | 388 | 1,286 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 33.3% | 0 | 73.03s | 5,124 | 2,302 | 22,546 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.94s | 54,810 | 2,619 | 370 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 321.47s | 61,516 | 18,824 | 63,861 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.94s | 7,140 | 222 | 0 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.81s | 7,143 | 435 | 1,414 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 15.39s | 732 | 69 | 5,195 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.1 | 6.5 | 11.1% | 1 | 126.85s | 560 | 49,045 | 157,522 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.66s | 477 | 114 | 142 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.90s | 498 | 63 | 1,743 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.21s | 660 | 93 | 115 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.26s | 678 | 151 | 1,210 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.19s | 642 | 232 | 88 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 33.71s | 665 | 568 | 22,392 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.53s | 5,454 | 246 | 0 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.25s | 6,861 | 246 | 503 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3.80s | 195 | 30 | 297 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 127.82s | 138 | 0 | 18,764 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGPT-6.1 SollowGemini 3.7 FlashmediumvsGPT-6.1 SollowKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGLM 5.2highMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5 MinimediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGLM 5.2highGPT-6 LunamediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGLM 5.2highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5.6 TerramediumvsGLM 5.2high