Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.019 vs $0.125. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) lebih cepat di 5.04s vs 10.06s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 56.1% vs 36.4%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-28

Peringkat
#131
Total token output
25,438
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
5.04s
Total Biaya
$0.125
Peringkat
#136
Total token output
90,507
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
10.06s
Total Biaya
$0.019
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.7 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 6.8x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Rilis: 2026-07-28
Skor 6.2 6.1
Peringkat #131 #136
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.2 9.2
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 56.1% 36.4%
Tes tidak stabil 5 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 2.490 0.262
Total Biaya $0.125 $0.019
Harga input $0.500 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Harga output $3.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total token input 96,346 218,731
Token output 8,211 90,507
Token penalaran 17,227 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 5.04s 10.06s
Waktu respons (maks) 19.44s 186.24s
Waktu respons (total) 110.88s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#131 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Biaya
$0.011
Waktu
10.2s
Token
1,897 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
34.0s
Token
4,814 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

gpt-oss-120bmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowQwen3.7 FlashnonevsInklinglowGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowGPT-5.6 LunalowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGPT-5.6 LunalowvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGPT-5 NanomediumvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsStep 3.5 Flashmedium