- Peringkat
- #122
- Total token output
- 220,942
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 98.19s
- Total Biaya
- $0.607
Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.0 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.607 vs $0.727. GLM 5.1 (medium) lebih cepat di 58.80s vs 98.19s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 63.6% vs 65.2%.
- Peringkat
- #117
- Total token output
- 215,889
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.80s
- Total Biaya
- $0.727
Model yang direkomendasikan
Kimi K2.5 (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Peringkat | #122 | #117 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Konsistensi | 7.0 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 63.6% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 8 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 4.849 | 6.923 |
| Total Biaya | $0.607 | $0.727 |
| Harga input | $0.571 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.850 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total token input | 118,496 | 82,592 |
| Token output | 53,522 | 16,089 |
| Token penalaran | 167,420 | 199,800 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 98.19s | 58.80s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 281.00s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1571.05s | 1234.72s |
| Parameter | 1T total (32B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Bobot tersedia | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#122 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.030
- Waktu
- 58.6s
- Token
- 8,683 tok
#117 GLM 5.1
medium
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsKimi K2.5mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1mediumGemini 3.5 FlashnonevsKimi K2.5mediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.1mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsSolar Pro 4highKimi K2.5mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGLM 5.1medium