#89 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
none- Biaya
- $0.010
- Waktu
- 29.0s
- Token
- 3,439 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Ringkasan
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.8 vs 6.7. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.061 vs $0.220. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 lebih cepat di 10.81s vs 27.11s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.4% vs 69.8%.
Model yang direkomendasikanMiMo-V2.5 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.8), while costing about 3.6x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Peringkat | #89 | #94 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.4% | 69.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 7 | 5 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.992 | 2.966 |
| Total Biaya | $0.220 | $0.061 |
| Harga input | $0.740 / 1M | $0.105 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.960 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,749 | 41,838 |
| Token output | 63,338 | 2,827 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 198,898 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 10.81s | 27.11s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 53.57s | 162.44s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 227.02s | 569.38s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#94 MiMo-V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 54.8s
- Token
- 5,247 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.1 | 4.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 22.52s | 7,893 | 22,440 | 0 | |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 97.14s | 7,422 | 557 | 81,977 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ring-2.6-1TmediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsMiMo-V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsgpt-oss-120bmediumTersedia gratisQwen3.7 MaxnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsKimi K2.7 CodemediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsQwen3.6 27Bmedium