#60 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 25.6s
- Token
- 2,939 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Step 3.7 Flash (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.7 vs 7.5. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.275 vs $0.341. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) lebih cepat di 12.95s vs 15.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.1% vs 68.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikanKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium)It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.5), lower cost than Step 3.7 Flash (low), and balanced response time.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.5 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #60 | #51 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.7 | 8.4 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 65.1% | 68.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 2.498 | 2.840 |
| Total Biaya | $0.275 | $0.341 |
| Harga input | $0.740 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.960 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,750 | 40,101 |
| Token output | 2,098 | 289,325 |
| Token penalaran | 80,027 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 12.95s | 15.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 81.45s | 124.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 271.92s | 330.63s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#51 Step 3.7 Flash
low
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 25.3s
- Token
- 3,072 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 33.10s | 7,893 | 416 | 33,658 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 9.46s | 7,437 | 18,685 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5mediumvsGPT-5.3 ChatnoneKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5mediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowMiniMax M3mediumvsStep 3.7 Flashlow