- Peringkat
- #355
- Total token output
- 879,532
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 63.15s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) vs Solar Decide
Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 3.7 vs 1.0. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.009. Solar Decide lebih cepat di 6.01s vs 63.15s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 18.8% vs 14.5%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #380
- Total token output
- 51
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 6.01s
- Total Biaya
- $0.009
Model yang direkomendasikan
Ling 3.0 Tiny (low)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Solar Decide Solar Decide none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 3.7 | 1.0 |
| Peringkat | #355 | #380 |
| Keandalan | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.7 | 2.0 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 21/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 18.8% | 14.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 21 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 0.119 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.009 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.050 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | $0.050 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 99,662 | 47,586 |
| Token output | 146,555 | 51 |
| Token penalaran | 732,977 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 63.15s | 6.01s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 252.08s | 13.10s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1389.35s | 42.05s |
| Parameter | 7.9B total (1.3B aktif) | ~35B total (~3B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#355 Ling 3.0 Tiny
low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 200.0s
- Token
- 5,030 tok
#380 Solar Decide
none
Belum ada hasil showcase yang dihasilkan untuk model ini.
- Biaya
- T/A
- Waktu
- -
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 21ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 25.30s | 750 | 5,100 | 94,884 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.41s | 1,239 | 3 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 170.73s | 7,619 | 56,012 | 170,220 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 134.79s | 72,165 | 19,498 | 125,503 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.82s | 8,016 | 1,531 | 6,288 | |
| Solar Decide | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 5.00s | 31,275 | 18 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 72.15s | 637 | 36,585 | 146,171 | |
| Solar Decide | 4.3 | 3.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 7.26s | 2,580 | 6 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 29.35s | 546 | 4,876 | 30,522 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.6 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.09s | 744 | 611 | 1,404 | |
| Solar Decide | 5.0 | 5.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 11.66s | 11,196 | 21 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.49s | 731 | 12,171 | 68,764 | |
| Solar Decide | 1.0 | 3.3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.47s | 1,296 | 3 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.94s | 8,226 | 380 | 708 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 213.54s | 228 | 9,791 | 88,513 | |
| Solar Decide | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.0 TinylowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneTersedia gratisGranite 4.1 8bnonevsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 TinylowvsGrok 4.20noneCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 TinylowvsQwen3.5-9BmediumMercury 2.5nonevsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 Tinylowvsgpt-oss-120bnoneCommand A+highvsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 TinylowvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinylowvsMiniMax M2.5mediumCommand A+nonevsLing 3.0 TinylowMercury 2nonevsLing 3.0 Tinylow