Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Tiny — low vs medium

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 3.8 vs 3.8. Biaya benchmark hampir imbang di $0.000 vs $0.000. low lebih cepat di 66.16s vs 68.08s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 19.7% vs 24.2%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-22

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#333
Total token output
879,532
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
66.16s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Peringkat
#336
Total token output
923,276
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
68.08s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan low

It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Rilis: 2026-08-07 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium Rilis: 2026-08-07
Skor 3.8 3.8
Peringkat #333 #336
Keandalan 9.6 9.6
Konsistensi 9.7 8.9
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 19.7% 24.2%
Tes tidak stabil 1 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.000
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.000
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 99,662 103,898
Token output 146,555 148,304
Token penalaran 732,977 774,972
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 66.16s 68.08s
Waktu respons (maks) 252.08s 262.20s
Waktu respons (total) 1389.33s 1429.66s
Parameter 7.9B total (1.3B aktif) 7.9B total (1.3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#333 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
200.0s
Token
5,030 tok

#336 Ling 3.0 Tiny

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
177.4s
Token
6,873 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 211.99s 7,948 70,838 206,006

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan