Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Inception: Mercury 2 vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T

Ling-2.6-1T unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.3 vs 4.6. Ling-2.6-1T memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.016 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 lebih cepat di 829ms vs 8.58s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 22.7% vs 18.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 1.9x less than Mercury 2.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none Rilis: 2026-02-24 Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Rilis: 2026-04-23
Skor 4.6 5.3
Peringkat #185 #158
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.2 10.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 22.7% 18.2%
Tes tidak stabil 2 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.734 0.277
Total Biaya $0.030 $0.016
Harga input $0.250 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Harga output $0.750 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total token input 88,704 106,414
Token output 9,564 11,555
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 829ms 8.58s
Waktu respons (maks) 4.52s 25.72s
Waktu respons (total) 18.24s 163.06s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#185 Mercury 2

none
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
1.8s
Token
1,514 tok

#158 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Mercury 2 3.4 9.6 0.0% 0 1.03s 7,229 3,088 0
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan