- Peringkat
- #131
- Total token output
- 87,554
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 2.95s
- Total Biaya
- $0.094
Mercury 2 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.0 vs 7.0. Mercury 2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.094 vs $0.727. Mercury 2 (medium) lebih cepat di 2.95s vs 58.80s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 53.0% vs 65.2%.
- Peringkat
- #129
- Total token output
- 215,889
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.80s
- Total Biaya
- $0.727
Model yang direkomendasikan
Mercury 2 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 7.8x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Peringkat | #131 | #129 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Konsistensi | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 53.0% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.933 | 6.923 |
| Total Biaya | $0.094 | $0.727 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.750 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total token input | 110,515 | 82,592 |
| Token output | 10,325 | 16,089 |
| Token penalaran | 77,229 | 199,800 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 2.95s | 58.80s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 14.63s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 61.89s | 1234.72s |
| Parameter | ~100B | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#131 Mercury 2
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 2.1s
- Token
- 1,702 tok
#129 GLM 5.1
medium
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Mercury 2mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneClaude Fable 5.1lowvsMercury 2mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsMercury 2mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsSolar Pro 4highStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsStep 3.7 Flashlow