#8 Gemini 3.5 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.068
- Waktu
- 39.1s
- Token
- 7,588 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.2 vs 8.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.349 vs $0.376. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 3.27s vs 20.35s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 90.5% vs 73.0%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (low)It has the best score here (9.2), while responding about 6.2x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Peringkat | #8 | #23 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 90.5% | 73.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 2 |
| Total Run | 63 | 61 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.834 | 2.686 |
| Total Biaya | $0.349 | $0.376 |
| Harga input | $1.500 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $9.000 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 36,938 | 39,981 |
| Token output | 2,033 | 319,958 |
| Token penalaran | 30,519 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 3.27s | 20.35s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 9.05s | 113.98s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 68.65s | 427.42s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#23 Step 3.7 Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.006
- Waktu
- 46.2s
- Token
- 4,466 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.71s | 8,118 | 458 | 13,420 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.8 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 27.42s | 7,437 | 44,797 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2 ChatnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.6 SolhighGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.5mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 Max PreviewmediumClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2high