- Peringkat
- #97
- Total token output
- 96,235
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 5.12s
- Total Biaya
- $0.272
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.052 vs $0.272. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) lebih cepat di 5.12s vs 41.37s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.8% vs 71.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #104
- Total token output
- 370,250
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 41.37s
- Total Biaya
- $0.052
Model yang direkomendasikan
Qwen3.7 Flash (high)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.8), while costing about 5.3x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #97 | #104 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 78.8% | 71.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 6 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.942 | 0.398 |
| Total Biaya | $0.272 | $0.052 |
| Harga input | $0.300 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M |
| Total token input | 103,916 | 116,331 |
| Token output | 8,892 | 12,330 |
| Token penalaran | 87,343 | 357,920 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 5.12s | 41.37s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 26.41s | 431.47s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 112.73s | 910.11s |
| Parameter | ~150B total (~10B aktif) | ~35B total (~3B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#97 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
medium- Biaya
- $0.010
- Waktu
- 17.8s
- Token
- 4,000 tok
#104 Qwen3.7 Flash
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 600.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.11s | 504 | 150 | 5,265 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.21s | 672 | 713 | 13,968 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 7.9 | 9.9 | 66.7% | 0 | 9.96s | 8,122 | 471 | 28,930 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 9.7 | 66.7% | 0 | 58.84s | 7,893 | 503 | 62,350 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 17.87s | 79,299 | 7,303 | 29,209 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.9 | 5.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 231.97s | 88,896 | 9,866 | 203,866 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.11s | 7,362 | 287 | 2,226 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.10s | 7,782 | 270 | 10,800 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 5.34s | 656 | 17 | 10,964 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 34.43s | 780 | 59 | 35,675 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 2.97s | 488 | 100 | 1,558 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 10.73s | 516 | 120 | 3,898 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 625 | 69 | 2,657 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.41s | 699 | 97 | 7,838 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 1.82s | 570 | 199 | 2,988 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 7.1 | 5.1 | 77.8% | 2 | 10.79s | 696 | 369 | 10,474 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.84s | 6,132 | 287 | 1,277 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.72s | 8,193 | 309 | 1,436 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3.75s | 158 | 9 | 2,269 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.70s | 204 | 24 | 7,615 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsKimi K3maxGPT-5.6 TerramediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2medium