- Peringkat
- #217
- Total token output
- 39,912
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.79s
- Total Biaya
- $0.183
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash (low)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.183. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low) lebih cepat di 4.79s vs 85.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 66.7% vs 66.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #222
- Total token output
- 704,170
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 85.22s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (low)
It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 17.8x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Peringkat | #217 | #222 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 6 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.521 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.183 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.300 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.030 / 1M | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | $0.084 / 1M | T/A |
| Total token input | 275,779 | 271,890 |
| Token output | 14,401 | 190,841 |
| Token penalaran | 25,511 | 513,329 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.79s | 85.22s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 53.91s | 432.81s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 110.24s | 1960.12s |
| Parameter | ~150B total (~10B aktif) | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#217 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
low- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 7.5s
- Token
- 2,669 tok
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 133.5s
- Token
- 12,950 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 53.91s | 136,614 | 1,502 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.0 | 8.3 | 91.7% | 1 | 1.69s | 506 | 351 | 4,032 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 917ms | 8,126 | 464 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 3.8 | 1.6 | 50.0% | 2 | 11.00s | 114,540 | 11,142 | 9,298 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 859ms | 7,364 | 287 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 3.55s | 658 | 18 | 6,902 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.34s | 488 | 97 | 1,049 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.75s | 621 | 70 | 1,872 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 1.19s | 572 | 168 | 1,494 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.39s | 6,132 | 293 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.65s | 158 | 9 | 864 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsLongCat 2.0noneGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsSolar Pro 4highDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneDots 3 Note PreviewhighTersedia gratisvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsSpace Bunny Alphamedium