Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.1 vs 8.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.584 vs $1.006. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) lebih cepat di 9.48s vs 64.16s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 81.8% vs 77.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Inkling (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Rilis: 2026-07-21 Inkling Inkling high Rilis: 2026-07-18
Skor 8.1 8.0
Peringkat #31 #32
Keandalan 10.0 9.8
Konsistensi 7.5 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 81.8% 77.3%
Tes tidak stabil 7 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.169 6.704
Total Biaya $0.584 $1.006
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total token input 105,138 86,746
Token output 8,315 6,055
Token penalaran 212,507 220,791
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 9.48s 64.16s
Waktu respons (maks) 43.93s 327.51s
Waktu respons (total) 208.52s 1411.59s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Biaya
$0.023
Waktu
23.6s
Token
9,128 tok

#32 Thinking Machines: Inkling

high
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
32.2s
Token
1,275 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Inkling 8.5 10.0 66.7% 0 148.36s 7,374 430 78,982

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan