Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.4 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.052 vs $0.058. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview lebih cepat di 1.58s vs 4.76s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 57.6% vs 40.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewIt has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 3.0x faster than Qwen3.5-27B.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Rilis: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.4 6.5
Peringkat #101 #98
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.7 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 57.6% 40.9%
Tes tidak stabil 1 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.431 0.763
Total Biaya $0.052 $0.058
Harga input $0.250 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Harga output $1.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total token input 120,942 102,316
Token output 14,292 24,321
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 1.58s 4.76s
Waktu respons (maks) 9.27s 69.46s
Waktu respons (total) 34.72s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#101 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
4.7s
Token
1,827 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Biaya
$0.007
Waktu
42.9s
Token
4,273 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan