Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Command A+ (medium) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Ling 3.0 Tiny unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.0 vs 3.0. Biaya benchmark hampir imbang di $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.0 Tiny lebih cepat di 14.02s vs 90.76s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 0.0% vs 9.1%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-23

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#355
Total token output
0
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
90.76s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Peringkat
#338
Total token output
110,071
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
14.02s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Ling 3.0 Tiny

It has the best score here (4.0), while responding about 6.5x faster than Command A+ (medium).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Command A+ Command A+ medium Rilis: 2026-09-23 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Rilis: 2026-08-07
Skor 3.0 4.0
Peringkat #355 #338
Keandalan 0.0 9.8
Konsistensi 10.0 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 0.0% 9.1%
Tes tidak stabil 0 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.000
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.000
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $1.500 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 0 184,579
Token output 0 110,071
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 90.76s 14.02s
Waktu respons (maks) 105.69s 240.61s
Waktu respons (total) 1996.78s 294.46s
Parameter 218B total (25B aktif) 7.9B total (1.3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#355 Command A+

medium
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.2s
Token
0 tok

#338 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
334.1s
Token
32,913 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 93.13s 0 0 0
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Command A+mediumvsJev 1.13noneLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLing 3.0 TinynoneCobuddymediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneCommand A+mediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneTersedia gratisTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing 3.0 TinynoneLing 3.0 TinynonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 TinylowCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 Tinyhigh