Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.9 vs 7.8. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.234 vs $0.405. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) lebih cepat di 43.12s vs 48.53s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 74.2% vs 71.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Rilis: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 7.9 7.8
Peringkat #42 #44
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.6 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 74.2% 71.2%
Tes tidak stabil 4 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.669 1.514
Total Biaya $0.234 $0.405
Harga input $0.250 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Harga output $2.000 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total token input 129,897 97,689
Token output 12,533 6,412
Token penalaran 88,047 184,825
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 48.53s 43.12s
Waktu respons (maks) 254.92s 291.55s
Waktu respons (total) 1067.74s 905.53s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
86.7s
Token
2,354 tok

#44 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.024
Waktu
219.0s
Token
12,235 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan