- Peringkat
- #277
- Total token output
- 32,069
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 17.51s
- Total Biaya
- $0.257
Seed-2.0-Code vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.4 vs 5.5. Ling 3.1 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.257. Ling 3.1 Flash lebih cepat di 15.75s vs 17.51s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 37.7% vs 33.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #272
- Total token output
- 85,777
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 15.75s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
Seed-2.0-Code
It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code none | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| Peringkat | #277 | #272 |
| Keandalan | 9.0 | 9.8 |
| Konsistensi | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 37.7% | 33.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 5 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 4.268 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.257 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.500 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $3.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 319,668 | 286,758 |
| Token output | 32,069 | 85,777 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 17.51s | 15.75s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 132.84s | 90.95s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 402.66s | 362.23s |
| Parameter | ~200B total (~20B aktif) | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#277 Seed-2.0-Code
none- Biaya
- $0.030
- Waktu
- 140.6s
- Token
- 9,924 tok
#272 Ling 3.1 Flash
none- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 171.4s
- Token
- 20,178 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 79.95s | 159,919 | 8,636 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 68.68s | 163,444 | 9,213 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.0 | 5.9 | 16.7% | 2 | 5.06s | 894 | 1,435 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.6 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.02s | 762 | 1,298 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.6 | 9.8 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.42s | 7,230 | 505 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.5 | 7.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 31.85s | 8,307 | 27,810 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 78.38s | 130,859 | 19,874 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 25.41s | 92,441 | 8,416 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.53s | 8,028 | 246 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.27s | 8,022 | 249 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 1.91s | 948 | 18 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 846 | 331 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.82s | 570 | 247 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.41s | 549 | 131 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.80s | 810 | 254 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.0 | 6.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.22s | 750 | 78 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 10.04s | 858 | 592 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 756 | 2,073 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 48.81s | 9,288 | 247 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.66s | 10,650 | 303 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.36s | 264 | 15 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.95s | 231 | 35,875 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-CodenonevsNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisLing 3.1 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisSeed-2.0-CodenonevsHy4 previewlowSeed-2.0-CodenonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneSeed-2.0-CodenonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisLing 3.1 FlashnonevsHy4 previewlowLing 3.1 FlashnonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodenonevsGranite 4.2 8BlowGranite 4.2 8BlowvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsSpace Bunny AlphalowSeed-2.0-CodenonevsSpace Bunny Alphalow