Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 4.7 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.032. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) lebih cepat di 9.61s vs 39.90s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 27.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while responding about 4.2x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Rilis: 2026-05-06 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Rilis: 2026-02-03
Skor 4.7 4.7
Peringkat #203 #202
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.2 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 45.5% 27.3%
Tes tidak stabil 6 3
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.793
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.032
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total token input 37,449 148,194
Token output 1,677 19,069
Token penalaran 116,703 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 39.90s 9.61s
Waktu respons (maks) 309.02s 81.80s
Waktu respons (total) 797.98s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#203 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
300.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan