#16 Claude Opus 4.7
medium- Biaya
- $0.059
- Waktu
- 26.8s
- Token
- 2,475 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
Ringkasan
GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.9 vs 8.7. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.679 vs $0.740. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) lebih cepat di 4.73s vs 16.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 82.5% vs 82.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.9), while responding about 3.4x faster than GPT-5.3-Codex (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium | GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Peringkat | #16 | #13 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 82.5% | 82.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 3.991 | 4.932 |
| Total Biaya | $0.679 | $0.740 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $1.750 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $14.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 65,406 | 34,299 |
| Token output | 11,858 | 2,357 |
| Token penalaran | 2,198 | 46,189 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.73s | 16.22s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 23.18s | 100.93s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 94.51s | 340.67s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#13 GPT-5.3-Codex
medium- Biaya
- $0.049
- Waktu
- 54.9s
- Token
- 3,580 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 12.96s | 10,635 | 7,629 | 1,114 | |
| GPT-5.3-Codex | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 19.50s | 7,302 | 535 | 10,890 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 SollowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGrok 4.5low