Classement Programmation
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Programmation, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Coût total ↑.
289/289
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Programmation | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #129 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 4.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 0/3 | 206.2s |
| #105 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 5.7 | 7.2 | $1.235 | 1/3 | 214.4s |
| #10 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 3/3 | 15.0s |
| #126 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 6.2 | 6.9 | $1.273 | 1/3 | 266.7s |
| #31 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 3/3 | 17.5s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 7.9 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 2/3 | 40.2s | |
| #32 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 3/3 | 15.7s |
| #29 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.6 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/3 | 13.0s |
| #16 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 3/3 | 360.8s |
| #81 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 5.9 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 1/3 | 5.54s |
| #36 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 8.8 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #15 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 3/3 | 9.56s |
| #52 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.709 | 3/3 | 22.9s |
| #39 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #30 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 3/3 | 22.2s |