Classement Programmation
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Programmation, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Coût total ↑.
289/289
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Programmation | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #60 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 8.8 | 7.9 | $0.495 | 2/3 | 27.4s |
| #4 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.496 | 3/3 | 11.3s |
| #94 | LongCat 2.0 medium | Meituan | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.499 | 3/3 | 455.0s |
| #144 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 3.3 | 6.6 | $0.505 | 1/1 | 2.84s |
| #106 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 6.4 | 7.2 | $0.506 | 1/3 | 22.0s |
| #66 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 6.1 | 7.8 | $0.523 | 1/3 | 7.19s |
| #85 | GPT 5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 5.6 | 7.5 | $0.533 | 1/3 | 10.5s |
| #107 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 8.8 | 7.2 | $0.535 | 2/3 | 96.0s |
| #25 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | 8.4 | 8.8 | $0.540 | 2/3 | 16.6s | |
| #119 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 5.5 | 7.0 | $0.544 | 1/3 | 1.35s |
| #278 | Grok Build 0.1 none | X AI | 3.3 | 4.0 | $0.547 | 1/1 | 21.4s |
| #168 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 4.6 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 0/3 | 3.67s |
| #59 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 8.8 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/3 | 9.82s |
| #149 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 5.5 | 6.6 | $0.621 | 1/3 | 1.53s | |
| #252 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 3.7 | 4.8 | $0.624 | 0/3 | 245.0s |