Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next — low vs xhigh

low leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.1. low has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.045 vs ~$0.195. low is faster at 23.66s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 79.7% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Response Time (avg)
23.66s
Total Cost
~$0.045
Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Recommended model low

It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 4.3x less than Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next low Release: 2026-10-04 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04
Score 8.0 7.1
Rank #96 #154
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.0 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.7% 72.5%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~0.299 ~1.390
Total Cost ~$0.045 ~$0.195
Input Price N/A N/A
Output Price N/A N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 342,163 301,749
Output Tokens 1,518 1,033
Reasoning Tokens 133,777 620,023
Response Time (avg) 23.66s 102.66s
Response Time (max) 166.72s 674.08s
Response Time (total) 544.16s 2361.10s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

low
Cost
~$0.002
Time
47.2s
Tokens
5,270 tok

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.46s 8,127 397 24,147
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 Flash NextlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 Flashlow