Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 27B (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.8. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 33.05s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#68
Total Output Tokens
136,162
Response Time (avg)
33.05s
Total Cost
N/A
Rank
#65
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.276
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #68 #65
Reliability 9.6 9.5
Consistency 9.7 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result N/A 2.159
Total Cost N/A $0.276
Input Price N/A $1.190 / 1M
Output Price N/A $3.740 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,266 37,199
Output Tokens 1,861 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 134,301 49,500
Response Time (avg) 33.05s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 214.63s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 694.04s 488.94s
Parameters 27.3B 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#68 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
N/A
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

#65 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair