Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code (low) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.151 vs $0.767. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 72.24s, with pass rates of 77.3% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-24

Compared models

Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
241,309
Response Time (avg)
72.24s
Total Cost
$0.767
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.151
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 5.1x less than Seed-2.0-Code (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code low Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #106 #98
Reliability 8.5 9.5
Consistency 7.8 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 77.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 5.899 2.159
Total Cost $0.767 $0.151
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.650 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $2.042 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,657 37,199
Output Tokens 8,142 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 233,167 49,500
Response Time (avg) 72.24s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 485.92s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 1589.31s 488.94s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Seed-2.0-Code

low
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.3s
Tokens
0 tok

#98 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 7.0 7.1 55.6% 1 109.70s 7,948 455 55,759
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair