Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.7 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.5. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $2.180. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.56s vs 113.10s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-21

Compared models

Rank
#120
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.56s
Total Cost
$0.197
Rank
#110
Total Output Tokens
416,086
Response Time (avg)
113.10s
Total Cost
$2.180
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 11.1x less than Grok 4.7 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 high Release: 2026-09-21
Score 7.4 7.5
Rank #120 #110
Reliability 9.9 9.5
Consistency 10.0 7.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 75.8%
Flaky tests 0 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.581 16.765
Total Cost $0.197 $2.180
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $1.600 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $4.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,992 113,892
Output Tokens 12,446 6,907
Reasoning Tokens 0 409,179
Response Time (avg) 4.56s 113.10s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 573.57s
Response Time (total) 100.30s 2488.20s
Parameters ~1T total (~40B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#110 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7

high
Cost
$0.110
Time
301.3s
Tokens
23,143 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Grok 4.7 6.0 4.6 66.7% 2 335.92s 10,266 353 199,976

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair