Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.296 vs $1.143. GLM 5.2 (high) is faster at 62.65s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.4), while costing about 3.9x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.4 8.0
Rank #19 #31
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 71.2%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.173 5.873
Total Cost $1.143 $0.296
Input Price $1.040 / 1M $0.293 / 1M
Output Price $6.240 / 1M $0.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,240 83,813
Output Tokens 5,098 69,688
Reasoning Tokens 164,842 225,659
Response Time (avg) 67.53s 62.65s
Response Time (max) 238.07s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 1485.64s 1378.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

#31 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair