Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.6. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.031. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 1.78s vs 3.73s, with pass rates of 30.2% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5-Pro - It has the best score here (5.5), while costing about 1.9x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.6 5.5
Rank #154 #124
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.2% 39.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.754 0.648
Total Cost $0.031 $0.017
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 19,329 30,724
Output Tokens 27,755 3,043
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.73s 1.78s
Response Time (max) 22.52s 8.32s
Response Time (total) 70.86s 37.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#124 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.6 7.6 16.7% 1 2.10s 696 1,571 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.3 8.1 8.3% 1 2.67s 645 994 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.54s 4,695 596 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.46s 7,788 248 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.32s 7,758 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 7.45s 781 11,381 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 877ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 4.4 3.0 33.3% 1 3.51s 520 1,545 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.58s 498 87 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.86s 709 1,264 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 684 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 714 573 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.7 4.7 77.8% 2 1.30s 678 267 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.30s 8,238 258 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 414ms 210 12 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.89s 216 14 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair