Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) vs Inkling Small (medium)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Inkling Small (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.117 vs $0.746. Inkling Small (medium) is faster at 6.27s vs 58.06s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Rank
#112
Total Output Tokens
55,321
Response Time (avg)
6.27s
Total Cost
$0.117
Recommended model Inkling Small (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 6.4x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Small Inkling Small medium Release: 2026-08-01
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #107 #112
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 56.1%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.712 1.166
Total Cost $0.746 $0.117
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,139 100,246
Output Tokens 61,819 6,422
Reasoning Tokens 678,766 48,899
Response Time (avg) 58.06s 6.27s
Response Time (max) 817.57s 17.26s
Response Time (total) 1161.18s 138.02s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#107 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#112 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
13.4s
Tokens
1,753 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Inkling Small 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 10.49s 7,374 434 13,783

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair