Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.6 27B (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

Qwen3.6 27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.195 vs $1.006. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) is faster at 102.66s vs 107.79s, with pass rates of 62.3% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#152
Total Output Tokens
287,899
Response Time (avg)
107.79s
Total Cost
$1.006
Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.2), while costing about 5.2x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #152 #154
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.7 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 62.3% 72.5%
Flaky tests 7 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 7.677 ~1.390
Total Cost $1.006 ~$0.195
Input Price $0.320 / 1M N/A
Output Price $3.200 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 264,147 301,749
Output Tokens 34,419 1,033
Reasoning Tokens 253,480 620,023
Response Time (avg) 107.79s 102.66s
Response Time (max) 1085.11s 674.08s
Response Time (total) 2479.26s 2361.10s
Parameters 27B 180B total (6B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#152 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Qwen3.6 27BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.6 27BmediumClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 Flash Nextxhigh