Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.122. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #137 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.636 0.935
Total Cost $0.122 $0.062
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,468 139,788
Output Tokens 51,487 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.56s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 206.05s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 298.31s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair