Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.073. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.06s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#140
Total Output Tokens
209,201
Response Time (avg)
25.28s
Total Cost
$0.073
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 4.0x less than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #140 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 36.4%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.933 0.262
Total Cost $0.073 $0.019
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 282,347 218,731
Output Tokens 209,201 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 25.28s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 480.96s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 556.24s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#140 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair