Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Step 3.5 Flash (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.108. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.06s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 51.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Rank
#146
Total Output Tokens
402,554
Response Time (avg)
174.22s
Total Cost
$0.108
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 5.8x less than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 6.1 6.0
Rank #136 #146
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 9.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 51.5%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.262 0.540
Total Cost $0.019 $0.108
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 218,731 65,707
Output Tokens 90,507 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 0 293,993
Response Time (avg) 10.06s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 186.24s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 221.34s 2613.32s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

#146 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair