Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

The average score is effectively tied at 5.1 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.025. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 9.12s vs 19.17s, with pass rates of 19.7% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder NextIt has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 2.1x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.1 5.1
Rank #183 #180
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 19.7% 25.8%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.490 0.488
Total Cost $0.021 $0.025
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,407 134,218
Output Tokens 37,484 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 19.17s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 382.06s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 421.74s 145.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#183 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#180 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair