Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5-27B leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 2.1x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.1
Rank #113 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 43.9%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.763 1.636
Total Cost $0.058 $0.122
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 102,316 94,468
Output Tokens 24,321 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.76s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 69.46s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 104.71s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#113 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair