Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (high)

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. GLM 5.3 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.610 vs $1.135. GLM 5.3 (high) is faster at 28.38s vs 114.73s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
635,288
Response Time (avg)
114.73s
Total Cost
$1.135
Rank
#105
Total Output Tokens
68,482
Response Time (avg)
28.38s
Total Cost
$0.610
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.9), while costing about 1.9x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high Release: 2026-08-20
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #96 #105
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 75.4%
Flaky tests 6 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 8.104 4.351
Total Cost $1.135 $0.610
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 288,919 219,811
Output Tokens 17,484 8,811
Reasoning Tokens 617,804 59,671
Response Time (avg) 114.73s 28.38s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 159.91s
Response Time (total) 2638.74s 652.78s
Parameters 27B 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#105 GLM 5.3

high
Cost
$0.085
Time
362.5s
Tokens
19,310 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
GLM 5.3 6.6 5.0 66.7% 2 18.89s 7,317 473 8,190

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair