- Rank
- #104
- Total Output Tokens
- 306,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 68.44s
- Total Cost
- $2.454
Grok 4.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (high)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.3 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.610 vs $2.454. GLM 5.3 (high) is faster at 28.38s vs 68.44s, with pass rates of 79.7% vs 75.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #105
- Total Output Tokens
- 68,482
- Response Time (avg)
- 28.38s
- Total Cost
- $0.610
Recommended model
GLM 5.3 (high)
It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.0x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium | GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Rank | #104 | #105 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.0 | 7.6 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 79.7% | 75.4% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 7 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 14.430 | 4.351 |
| Total Cost | $2.454 | $0.610 |
| Input Price | $2.000 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Output Price | $6.000 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 308,369 | 219,811 |
| Output Tokens | 7,013 | 8,811 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 299,031 | 59,671 |
| Response Time (avg) | 68.44s | 28.38s |
| Response Time (max) | 436.38s | 159.91s |
| Response Time (total) | 1574.14s | 652.78s |
| Parameters | ~1.7T total (~170B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#104 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Cost
- $0.044
- Time
- 59.4s
- Tokens
- 7,512 tok
#105 GLM 5.3
high- Cost
- $0.085
- Time
- 362.5s
- Tokens
- 19,310 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Step 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highGrok 4.6mediumvsGLM 5.3highMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3highGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5mediumGrok 4.5lowvsGLM 5.3highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGLM 5.3highClaude Fable 5.1highvsGrok 4.5medium