Navigate
Advertise here

MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.3. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.190 vs $0.262. GLM 5.3 (high) is faster at 27.82s vs 60.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 74.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-22

Compared models

Rank
#126
Total Output Tokens
615,978
Response Time (avg)
60.62s
Total Cost
$0.190
Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
63,667
Response Time (avg)
27.82s
Total Cost
$0.262
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (high)

It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 2.2x faster than MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiMo-V2.6-Flash MiMo-V2.6-Flash medium Release: 2026-09-22 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high Release: 2026-08-20
Score 7.4 7.3
Rank #126 #130
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 7.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 74.2%
Flaky tests 6 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.723 3.099
Total Cost $0.190 $0.262
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.910 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $2.861 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 121,240 87,601
Output Tokens 7,516 6,006
Reasoning Tokens 608,462 57,661
Response Time (avg) 60.62s 27.82s
Response Time (max) 357.28s 159.91s
Response Time (total) 1333.53s 612.06s
Parameters 309B total (15B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#126 MiMo-V2.6-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
61.0s
Tokens
10,798 tok

#130 GLM 5.3

high
Cost
$0.085
Time
362.5s
Tokens
19,310 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash 7.2 5.1 77.8% 2 18.23s 7,422 533 31,521
GLM 5.3 6.6 5.0 66.7% 2 18.89s 7,317 473 8,190

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair