Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.218 vs $2.949. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) is faster at 61.90s vs 120.88s, with pass rates of 75.4% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#131
Total Output Tokens
368,836
Response Time (avg)
120.88s
Total Cost
$2.949
Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
631,843
Response Time (avg)
61.90s
Total Cost
$0.218
Recommended model MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 13.5x less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high Release: 2026-08-12 MiMo-V2.6-Flash MiMo-V2.6-Flash medium Release: 2026-09-22
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #131 #132
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.4% 66.7%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 18.696 1.815
Total Cost $2.949 $0.218
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.250 / 1M $0.003 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 295,642 291,988
Output Tokens 115,041 8,848
Reasoning Tokens 353,398 622,995
Response Time (avg) 120.88s 61.90s
Response Time (max) 532.28s 357.28s
Response Time (total) 2780.16s 1423.67s
Parameters 2.4T total (95B active) 309B total (15B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#131 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#132 MiMo-V2.6-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
61.0s
Tokens
10,798 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 5.9 6.3 55.6% 1 160.52s 6,399 3,310 48,078
MiMo-V2.6-Flash 7.2 5.1 77.8% 2 18.23s 7,422 533 31,521

Switch Comparison Pair