Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.4. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.190 vs $2.357. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) is faster at 60.62s vs 120.59s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-22

Compared models

Rank
#125
Total Output Tokens
456,028
Response Time (avg)
120.59s
Total Cost
$2.357
Rank
#126
Total Output Tokens
615,978
Response Time (avg)
60.62s
Total Cost
$0.190
Recommended model MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 12.4x less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high Release: 2026-08-12 MiMo-V2.6-Flash MiMo-V2.6-Flash medium Release: 2026-09-22
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #125 #126
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.3 7.8
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 16.832 1.723
Total Cost $2.357 $0.190
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,931 121,240
Output Tokens 112,801 7,516
Reasoning Tokens 343,227 608,462
Response Time (avg) 120.59s 60.62s
Response Time (max) 532.28s 357.28s
Response Time (total) 2653.05s 1333.53s
Parameters 2.4T total (95B active) 309B total (15B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#125 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#126 MiMo-V2.6-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
61.0s
Tokens
10,798 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 5.9 6.3 55.6% 1 160.52s 6,399 3,310 48,078
MiMo-V2.6-Flash 7.2 5.1 77.8% 2 18.23s 7,422 533 31,521

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair