#9 GPT-5.5
low- Cost
- $0.068
- Time
- 37.0s
- Tokens
- 2,339 tok
OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 69.7%.
Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 3.2x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).
Last updated at: 2026-07-21
| Metric | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.3 | 6.5 |
| Rank | #9 | #107 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 10.0 | 7.9 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 86.4% | 69.7% |
| Flaky tests | 0 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 6.594 | 3.124 |
| Total Cost | $1.253 | $0.082 |
| Input Price | $5.000 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Output Price | $30.000 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 80,058 | 105,447 |
| Output Tokens | 5,378 | 7,120 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 23,040 | 230,682 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.13s | 32.20s |
| Response Time (max) | 56.19s | 162.44s |
| Response Time (total) | 222.82s | 708.46s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#107 MiMo-V2.5
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 54.8s
- Tokens
- 5,247 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Qwen3.5-27BnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumQwen3.6 Max PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowLongCat 2.0highvsMiMo-V2.5mediumMiMo-V2.5mediumvsGLM 5.2noneGPT-5.5lowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5nonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.5low