Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.5 (low) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 8.4. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.143 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#9
Total Output Tokens
28,418
Response Time (avg)
10.13s
Total Cost
$1.253
Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Recommended model GPT-5.5 (low)

It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 6.7x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 9.3 8.4
Rank #9 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 86.4% 80.3%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.594 8.173
Total Cost $1.253 $1.143
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,058 79,240
Output Tokens 5,378 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 23,040 164,842
Response Time (avg) 10.13s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 56.19s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 222.82s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair