Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $1.253. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 10.13s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 9.3 6.1
Rank #9 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 86.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.594 0.935
Total Cost $1.253 $0.062
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,058 139,788
Output Tokens 5,378 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 23,040 0
Response Time (avg) 10.13s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 56.19s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 222.82s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair