Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.138 vs $0.981. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) is faster at 13.24s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#61
Total Output Tokens
97,122
Response Time (avg)
13.24s
Total Cost
$0.138
Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
614,429
Response Time (avg)
111.94s
Total Cost
$0.981
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano (medium)

It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 7.1x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano medium Release: 2026-03-17 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #61 #66
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 72.7%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.150 8.324
Total Cost $0.138 $0.981
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 82,819 111,635
Output Tokens 7,100 15,999
Reasoning Tokens 90,022 598,430
Response Time (avg) 13.24s 111.94s
Response Time (max) 94.06s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 291.33s 2462.67s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#61 GPT-5.4 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
24.6s
Tokens
4,943 tok

#66 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 19.12s 7,305 516 20,778
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair