Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.1 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.9. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $1.135. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) is faster at 87.39s vs 114.73s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 76.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
687,692
Response Time (avg)
87.39s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
635,288
Response Time (avg)
114.73s
Total Cost
$1.135
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high Release: 2026-10-03 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #106 #98
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.6% 76.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 8.104
Total Cost $0.000 $1.135
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 324,691 288,919
Output Tokens 181,251 17,484
Reasoning Tokens 506,441 617,804
Response Time (avg) 87.39s 114.73s
Response Time (max) 665.85s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 2010.08s 2638.74s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Ling 3.1 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
181.1s
Tokens
21,073 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 83.41s 8,298 17,470 54,626
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair