Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

GPT-5.3 Chat leads on average score with 7.5 vs 6.9. GPT-5.3 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.571 vs $0.738. GPT-5.3 Chat is faster at 6.88s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#62
Total Output Tokens
30,854
Response Time (avg)
6.88s
Total Cost
$0.571
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model GPT-5.3 Chat

It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 6.5x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.3 Chat GPT-5.3 Chat none Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.5 6.9
Rank #62 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.387 6.784
Total Cost $0.571 $0.738
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,990 129,041
Output Tokens 30,854 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 6.88s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 18.33s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 151.31s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 GPT-5.3 Chat

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
8.1s
Tokens
634 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.3 Chat 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 10.52s 7,302 6,632 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair