Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.317 vs $1.036. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) is faster at 46.36s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 3.3x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.2 7.2
Rank #68 #70
Reliability 9.4 9.6
Consistency 8.3 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.821 3.023
Total Cost $1.036 $0.317
Input Price $0.684 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $3.420 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 68,902 42,097
Output Tokens 111,680 2,280
Reasoning Tokens 279,860 166,613
Response Time (avg) 109.98s 46.36s
Response Time (max) 876.20s 189.38s
Response Time (total) 2309.56s 973.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#68 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

#70 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair