Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Kimi K2.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.046 vs $1.222. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) is faster at 64.16s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.2), while responding about 1.7x faster than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #67 #71
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.3 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.821 8.509
Total Cost $1.222 $1.046
Input Price $0.950 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $4.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 68,902 124,771
Output Tokens 111,680 44,077
Reasoning Tokens 279,860 443,141
Response Time (avg) 109.98s 64.16s
Response Time (max) 876.20s 519.30s
Response Time (total) 2309.56s 1411.60s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

#71 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair