Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Compared models

Kimi K2.6 (medium) vs Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs GLM 5 (medium) vs Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) benchmark comparison: Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on Score with 8.1. Kimi K2.6 (medium) leads on Reliability with 10.0. GLM 5 (medium) has the lowest Total Cost at $0.479. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is fastest at 14.12s.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#210
Total Output Tokens
344,502
Response Time (avg)
121.25s
Total Cost
$1.594
Rank
#253
Total Output Tokens
209,217
Response Time (avg)
125.76s
Total Cost
$0.841
Rank
#184
Total Output Tokens
120,942
Response Time (avg)
39.05s
Total Cost
$0.479
Rank
#116
Total Output Tokens
57,978
Response Time (avg)
14.12s
Total Cost
$3.636
Recommended model Claude Opus 4.7 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.1), while responding about 6.8x faster than the other models in this comparison.

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12 Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16
Score 6.8 6.4 7.2 8.1
Rank #210 #253 #184 #116
Reliability 10.0 9.6 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.1 7.9 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69 66/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.9% 60.9% 76.8% 81.2%
Flaky tests 4 8 5 2
Total Runs 69 69 66 69
Cost per result 12.282 6.085 2.552 20.200
Total Cost $1.594 $0.841 $0.479 $3.636
Input Price $0.950 / 1M $0.450 / 1M $0.600 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.000 / 1M $2.250 / 1M $1.920 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.160 / 1M $0.070 / 1M $0.120 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A N/A $6.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 226,880 292,271 212,440 437,293
Output Tokens 65,346 55,025 22,922 29,102
Reasoning Tokens 331,325 186,071 115,335 28,876
Response Time (avg) 121.25s 125.76s 39.05s 14.12s
Response Time (max) 876.20s 566.79s 110.70s 150.60s
Response Time (total) 2667.55s 2137.84s 546.68s 310.55s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 1T total (32B active) 744B total (40B active) ~5T total (~500B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#210 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

#253 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#184 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

#116 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114

Switch Comparison Pair